Turn business priorities into measurable results.

Yes. A roadmap, technology evaluation, program health check or PMO engagement can stand on its own. You can also engage Zeak across the full journey, with scope and checkpoints agreed at the outset.

The deliverables depend on the scope. They may include a prioritized roadmap, future-state design, technology comparison, program assessment, corrective-action plan or delivery structure, with owners and decision points.

It depends on scope. Focused assessments and program health checks are typically measured in weeks, not months, and the timeline is agreed in the proposal.

Yes, on Dynamics 365, SAP, Oracle, NetSuite or another platform. We review scope, progress, governance, resources, dependencies, risks and business alignment, then recommend practical actions to improve delivery.

Yes. We agree responsibilities, decision rights and dependencies so business teams, IT and implementation partners work to one coordinated plan.

PMO leadership establishes the delivery structure: planning, governance, reporting, resource coordination and escalation. Project execution and delivery leads the work itself, aligning teams and partners, managing dependencies and coordinating delivery against the plan. You can engage for either service or combine them.

No. We can start with business priorities, process performance, growth opportunities or a new service. Technology evaluation follows where it can help achieve the agreed outcome.

Yes. We assess customer needs, differentiation, delivery capability and economics. A focused evaluation can test the opportunity before a larger investment. Market-share gains are an objective to test, not a guaranteed result.

We compare options against your requirements, including functionality, scalability, cost, implementation effort, integration and long-term fit. We explain the rationale and tradeoffs behind the recommendation.

No. Advisory can stand on its own, and not every problem needs AI. We assess existing systems and available options against your priorities. Any proposed Zeak licensing is explained separately, and AI is used only where it fits.

We agree a specific workflow, test cases, success measures, budget and decision point. We assess quality, failure handling, supervision, integration and total cost, then recommend whether to proceed, revise or stop.

We agree deliverables, checkpoints, a baseline, target, data source and accountable owner. Measures may include delivery performance, cycle time, margin, cash flow, service quality or adoption, alongside operating costs.

No. We assess revenue potential, service quality, capacity, cycle time and delivery cost. Small specialist teams may gain capacity or competitiveness. We do not assume whole departments can be replaced or that layoffs are required for value.

We review acceptance measures, reliability, exception handling, permissions, responsible owners and support costs. The operating model and escalation path must be ready alongside the solution.

Within the agreed scope, Zeak coordinates the work from input through to accepted output, with named owners, exception handling and performance reviews. We define dependencies and responsibilities explicitly; your business retains approval and decision authority.

Solutions run in your own cloud environment under your access policies, with role-based permissions, audit trails and managed DevOps.

You retain authority over business priorities, funding, approvals and business decisions. Documentation, training, access, transition deliverables, intellectual-property rights and licensing are defined in the agreement.

Yes, where included in the engagement. We agree service coverage, monitoring, escalation, operating responsibilities and improvement reviews before launch.

Yes. A fixed-scope project or paid evaluation can lead to a retainer or agreed operating support. Each commitment has its own deliverables, coverage, fees and review points.