Solutions/iQM Quality Management

Quality decisions belong where the work happens.

Deviations, complaints, CAPA, change control, risk, tasks and samples run on the same orders, batches and suppliers they affect—standalone or connected to your systems. Every workflow is configured to your products and transactions. Not every quality problem needs AI.

Bring your quality problemSee the demo
Take the details with youFree PDF downloads
zeak1 PAGE
iQM QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Quality decisions belong where the work happens.
zeak.io
One-page brochure
Problems, value, standards and how to start
Download PDF
zeakCUSTOMER OVERVIEW
7 MODULES · 197 FEATURES
iQM Quality Management
zeak.io
Customer overview
Every feature, the value method and how a pilot works
Download PDF
  • Production-ready
  • Deployed in your cloud
  • SOC 2 & ISO 27001 controls
  • GDPR-aligned
  • D365 · SAP · Oracle · NetSuite · any system
The business case

The costliest failures are the ones nobody could trace in time.

A wafer lot, a flight-critical part, a returned order or a drug batch—the expensive part is the same: finding what was affected, who received it, which supplier caused it and whether the fix worked.

The cost of doing nothing

15–20%

of sales revenue is commonly lost to the cost of poor quality. Scrap, rework, retest, absorbed claims and the hours spent rebuilding context.

ASQ, cost of quality resourcesRead

Quality failures stop supply

US drug shortages that followed manufacturing or quality problems62%

CAPA and complaint handling are the two most-cited quality-system sections in FDA device inspections. The fix that never reaches the process is the finding that comes back.

FDA, Drug Shortages: Root Causes (2019)ReadMed Device Online, FDA inspection trendsRead

Every industry has a number

$26–36B
yearly cost of poor quality in medical devices (McKinsey)
$10M
average direct cost of a food recall (FMI and GMA)
$743B
merchandise returned to US retailers in a year (NRF)
1,800+
suspect counterfeit electronic-part cases in US defense supply (US Senate)

Different industries, the same need: the quality record has to know what it affected.

Full sources in the customer overviewSee sources
Waiting isn't neutral. Every month quality lives apart from the work is a month of context rebuilt by hand, supplier claims missed and fixes that never reach the process.

External research benchmarks, not Zeak customer results or promised returns. Survey populations, methods and use cases differ.

Key benefits

Six quality problems. A proof you can check for each.

Every proof comes from your own data.

Close quality events faster

  • Quality events live apart from the work

    Deviations and complaints sit in spreadsheets, paper or a separate system, cut off from the order, batch and supplier.

    With Zeak: Raised on the order, batch, lot or supplier they affect, with the context captured when it happens.

    Proof you can checkEvents linked to batch, order or supplier
  • Investigations cross too many teams

    Quality, production, supply chain and suppliers pass the record around by email.

    With Zeak: Owned tasks, due dates and escalations; every team works on the same record.

    Proof you can checkDeviation and CAPA cycle time
  • The same problem keeps coming back

    A local fix never reaches the process, the specification or the supplier.

    With Zeak: CAPA linked to the cause, governed change control and effectiveness checks.

    Proof you can checkRepeat deviations after a CAPA

Stay in control and audit-ready

  • One workflow does not fit every product

    Sterile and non-sterile, raw material and finished goods, all forced through the same steps.

    With Zeak: Every workflow configured by product category, transaction type, site and severity—without code.

    Proof you can checkWorkflows changed without a release
  • Proving compliance takes days

    Evidence for an audit or inspection is assembled by hand.

    With Zeak: Electronic records and signatures where required, an append-only trail and evidence exported on demand.

    Proof you can checkHours to evidence an audit sample
  • A risk register nobody trusts

    Risk files are updated once a year, if at all.

    With Zeak: A risk file every module keeps current from live deviations, complaints, samples and changes.

    Proof you can checkRisks updated from live events
What it is worth

We don't lead with a savings number. We measure yours.

Poor quality costs money in six places, and the quality budget shows only some of them. We measure each one with your records—and Quality and Finance sign the baseline before anything changes.

Where the cost sitsWith iQMMeasured as
01

Record admin and re-keying

Batch, order, supplier and SOP filled in from your systems; one task list instead of email chasing.

Records a year × admin hours each × loaded rate

02

Held batches and slow release

Investigations start with the batch, stage, SOP revision and supplier already on the record.

Held batches × extra hold days × cost of a hold day

03

Repeat failures

CAPA linked to governed change and effectiveness checks, so the fix reaches the process.

Recurring events × rework, scrap and retest per event

04

Cost absorbed instead of recovered

Supplier, transport and third-party claims recorded on the complaint, with the evidence attached.

Claims not filed or lost × average claim value

05

Inspection and audit effort

Numbered, routed and signed records, with evidence exported on demand.

Audits a year × hours to prepare × rate, plus remediation

06

External failures

Lot traceability, complaints to CAPA, and recalls and mock recalls on the lot.

Events traced to quality × cost per event

Six steps, two weeks, your own numbers

Part of Discover
  1. 1Count the recordsDeviations, CAPAs, complaints, changes and samples a year, by site
  2. 2Measure the adminWho touched 10–20 recent records, for how long, and what was re-keyed
  3. 3Measure hold and cycle timeDays from event to closure; days batches waited for a decision
  4. 4Count repeats and recoveriesEvents that recurred; claims filed, lost or never raised; credits received
  5. 5Price audit and external failureHours per audit; complaints, returns and recalls traced to quality
  6. 6Agree it with Quality and FinanceSign the baseline before anything changes
How payback is calculatedPayback in weeks = first-year cost ÷ measured weekly valueThe cost comes from your proposal. The value comes from your pilot. Neither comes from an industry average.
Plus the build you don't fundNo ERP quality build to commission, and no custom code to retest and re-validate at every ERP update—before any saving is counted.For context: whole ERP projects show a median cost of $450,000 and a median timeline of 9 months (Panorama Consulting, 2025 ERP Report).
Value Finance can stand behind.Baseline signed firstRecovered means receivedEach benefit counted onceNever built on headcount reduction

If the pilot doesn't show value on your own records, you stop—and you keep everything you learned.

Built around your decisions

One quality record. Every team's decision on it.

Quality & regulatory
VP Quality · QA managers · Regulatory

Controlled, connected and inspection-ready.

See open CAPAs, deviations and complaints by status and age, changes awaiting approval, and reporting deadlines.

Measured on
Overdue CAPAsRepeat findingsDeadlines met
  • Every CAPA linked to its source and to the change that fixed it
  • Regulatory reports, deadlines and alerts on the complaint
  • Numbered, signed records an inspector can follow end to end
Key features

Seven connected processes. Configured your way.

Change control, CAPA, deviations, complaints, tasks, risk and samples share one platform layer—audited on every transaction, signed where your procedures require it, and connected to the systems you already run.

Download detailed features
197 features across 7 modules and one platform layer
Open any module to see what each feature does and what you get from it.
Business benefitEvery change governed, routed and verified, with its cost in view.Quality · Regulatory · Engineering · Finance
Change requestsYour team raises a change with a reason, description, category, type, overall impact, priority, an emergency flag and a planned or unplanned classification. Requester, department, request date and estimated completion are recorded, and the system stamps who created it and when.You get: Every change starts as one controlled, attributable record instead of an email.
Work queues by stageSeparate views for Draft, Submitted, Approved, Implemented, Verified, Rejected and Closed changes, each with filtering.You get: Owners and approvers see exactly what is waiting at their stage.
Controlled lifecycleSubmit for approval, recall, approve, reject, revise the proposal, implement, verify and close. Each step is a deliberate action by an authorized user.You get: Approval, execution and verification are recorded as separate control points, which is what auditors look for.
Department approval routingChoose Standard or Custom workflow. Each department can approve in one stage or several, with a primary approver and second and third approvers, and its own member list.You get: Changes reach the people who understand them, without a central bottleneck.
Budget and currency controlSwitch budget control on where change cost matters: set the overrun policy, default and budget currency, exchange-rate type, and the user groups allowed to override.You get: Quality change and financial governance meet in one record.
Numbering your wayAssign the change number sequence, or number changes by department to match existing conventions.You get: Identifiers your organization already recognizes.
Impact assessment typesMaintain the impact-assessment types your changes are assessed against.You get: Assessments use one controlled vocabulary.
Affected-object impactList the items, formulas, routes, resources, vendors and SOPs a change affects, with the impact on each, before approval.You get: Reviewers approve knowing exactly what the change touches.
Implementation task planBreak an approved change into owned, dated tasks in the shared task list.You get: Execution between approval and verification is visible.
Post-change effectiveness checkPlan and record a check that the change achieved its intent before closure.You get: Proof that the change worked, not just that it was done.
Intake defaultsSet default category, type, priority, impact, emergency and planned values, and default completion days from which target dates are calculated.You get: Faster, more consistent intake with fewer keying errors.
Formal change reportsChange or remove the report logo and choose whether approver signatures print on the report.You get: Change records that are ready to file or hand to an auditor.
Reasons on reject and reviseCapture a reason code and comment whenever a change is rejected or sent back.You get: Requesters know why, and the history explains itself.
Linked-records viewSee every CAPA, deviation and risk that points at a change, with its status.You get: Change owners see what depends on their change.
Document and training impactFlag SOPs to revise and roles to retrain, through your document and training systems.You get: Procedures and people catch up with the change.
Change classes and profilesMinor, major and critical changes each get the rigor they need, with separate regulated and non-regulated profiles that can run in the same company.You get: One change process that fits a GMP plant and a distribution center.
Customer and supplier change noticesNotify the customers who bought an affected item, track their acknowledgments, and turn every supplier change notice into a reviewed change.You get: Customers hear about changes on time, and supplier changes never slip in unreviewed.
Changes that update ERPApproved changes launch the BOM, formula, route and vendor updates they need, and the change cannot close until those are effective.You get: What was approved is what the ERP runs.
Label, SDS and registration triggersA formula or packaging change flags every safety data sheet, label, registration and customer specification it touches.You get: Regulated content never lags the product.
Regulatory filing impactRecord what each change means for your registrations in each market, and hold implementation until the approval it needs arrives.You get: No change goes live ahead of its approval.
Multi-site rolloutFollow one approved change through every site that must implement it, each with its own date and verification.You get: Nothing is closed while a site is still on the old process.
Process-safety management of changeA management-of-change variant with hazard review and a pre-startup safety review before anything restarts.You get: Quality and process-safety change in one governed record.
Technology transfer and scale-upRun transfers between sites and contract manufacturers as governed changes with comparability and readiness by site.You get: Transfers that arrive ready to run.
Your requirementsStart with iQM and extend it to how your company works—rapidly.See how to engage

Each module has core features plus advanced and industry features. Availability by release is confirmed in your proposal and verified during the pilot.

A connected decision

From a customer complaint to a governed fix, with the supplier paying its share.

  1. 01RecordForeign material reported in a finished product, logged against the product and batch.
  2. 02UnderstandTraced to one supplier's lot; the claim is recorded on the complaint the same day.
  3. 03ActA CAPA is created from the complaint; containment tasks go to receiving and production.
  4. 04ChangeAn incoming-inspection change is routed to Quality and Procurement and implemented within budget.
  5. 05VerifyThe change is verified, the CAPA closed with e-signature, and every step is in the history.
Without the connected view

Procurement learns about the supplier issue weeks later, the claim window has closed, and the fix is a memo, not a change.

With it

One complaint carries the product, the supplier claim, the CAPA, the tasks and the change—and posts a signal to the supplier risk.

Configured to your products and transactions, not customized in code.

A deviation on a sterile product routes to QA and the production head, with a 5-day root cause and a signature at closure. On a non-sterile product it routes to the area supervisor with a 10-day target. One workflow, two configurations.

What your administrator configures—versioned and approved
Forms and required fieldsCategories and typesNumberingApproval routingElectronic signaturesDue dates and service levelsTask templatesEffectiveness checksRisk scoringNotifications
The platform under every module

Standalone, connected or both. Your systems stay the system of record.

No need to customize your ERP or fund a costly custom build. Connect read-only first; switch on write-back object by object when you approve it.

01

Start standalone

iQM holds its own items, lots, suppliers and orders. A team can be running in days, with no integration project.

02

Connect to what you run

Live links to records in your ERP, MES, LIMS, PLM or CRM, with the context filled in on every quality record.

03

Mix across the enterprise

One quality picture across sites on D365, NetSuite, SAP or standalone—including acquired businesses.

Connects to
Microsoft Dynamics 365
SAP S/4HANA
Oracle
NetSuite

and any other ERP, MES, LIMS, PLM, CRM or custom system—including your custom fields and objects.

AI where it earns its place

Not every quality problem needs AI. Most need connected records and clear decisions.

AI is off until you switch it on. Where enabled, it suggests—showing its basis—and a named person decides. AI never approves, closes or signs a record.

  • High volumes of free-text complaints, reviews and returnsSuggested classification and duplicate grouping, reviewed by a person
  • Finding similar past casesRanked suggestions for the investigator, with the reasoning shown
  • Weak patterns across many recordsEmerging-risk suggestions a risk owner accepts or rejects
The autonomy ladder · set by you, per site
  1. 1ObserveRead-only and in parallel. Your process runs exactly as today.
  2. 2AdviseSuggests values, flags risks and proposes links. People accept or reject.
  3. 3AssistPre-fills records and drafts actions. Nothing is committed without a person.
  4. 4ActAutomation for routine, well-proven cases only. Exceptions route to people.

Most quality value comes at Observe and Advise. Many customers never need Act—and that is fine.

Standards

Built to support the standards you're held to.

Supported through configuration; applicability depends on your industry and markets. Not a claim of certification: compliance is your organization's obligation, and Zeak produces the evidence.

  • FDA 21 CFR Part 11
  • EU GMP Annex 11
  • ALCOA+
  • FDA cGMP
  • ICH Q9 and Q10
  • ISO 9001
  • ISO 13485 / QMSR
  • ISO 14971
  • IATF 16949
  • AS9100
  • AIAG-VDA FMEA
  • FSMA
  • ISO 22716
  • SOX and J-SOX
  • SOC 2 controls
  • ISO 27001 controls
  • GDPR
Industries

Built for every industry. Configured to the way yours works.

Regulated or not. Most real companies don't fit one box—that's normal. The same seven modules are configured to your products, risks and rules, with industry starter packs.

Pharma, Biotech and Medical Devices

Deviations and CAPA on the batch, SOP revision on the record, complaints to CAPA, chain of identity and signed decisions.

  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Biotech
  • Cell Therapy
  • Gene Therapy
  • Medical Devices

Chemicals and Process

Off-spec lots and claims, incoming sample failures, vendor claims and process-safety management of change.

  • Specialty Chemicals
  • Commodity Chemicals
  • Process Manufacturing

Food and Beverage

Allergen and hold control, lot traceability, HACCP, recalls and mock recalls.

  • Food
  • Beverage
  • Ingredients

Cosmetics and CPG

Adverse events traced to ingredients; packaging and label changes governed and verified before launch.

  • Cosmetics
  • Personal Care
  • Consumer Goods

Semiconductors and Electronics

Excursions traced to lots and wafers; customer and supplier change notices on the JEDEC clock.

  • Fabs
  • Components
  • Electronics Manufacturing

Aerospace and Defense

Nonconformance, counterfeit and suspect parts, first articles and FOD and special-process events.

  • Primes
  • Tier Suppliers
  • MRO

Automotive, Industrial and Discrete

8D, part approvals, field returns to root cause and FMEA linked to control plans.

  • Automotive
  • Industrial
  • Electrical
  • Discrete Manufacturing

Distribution, E-Commerce and General Manufacturing

Returns traced to suppliers, carrier and 3PL scorecards, and scrap and rework made visible.

  • Wholesale
  • Online
  • General Manufacturing

Industry features are configured and phased to your scope. Regulated workflows require use-case-specific configuration and validation, confirmed with your quality team.

Security and DevOps

Trust is part of the product. Releases that never surprise production.

The controls that let a quality head, a regulator and an IT owner all say yes—and a governed release path for every update.

Security, records and governance

Your cloud or oursYour own cloud tenant or the Zeak cloud, under the identity and security your IT team operates.
SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controlsOperated under SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls, with GDPR-aligned data handling.
Every transaction auditedEvery create, update, approval, signature and system event recorded with who, what, when, old and new values and why.
Signatures where they matterElectronic signatures with a recorded meaning on approvals and closures, where your procedures require them.
Approvals follow your organizationDepartment approvers, one stage or several, scaled by change class. No self-approval.
Your data, always exportableEvery record, file, audit entry and setting in open formats, at any time.

DevOps, validation and release management

Test before productionEvery versioned release tested in your test environment and promoted under your change control.
Validation acceleratorTraceability matrix, IQ/OQ/PQ templates, risk-based test scripts and vendor test evidence for each release.
Versioned connectorsTested against supported releases of your systems and maintained by Zeak—outside your ERP code.
One release pathProduct updates, configuration changes and your enhancements ship through the same governed path.

Regulated workflows, including electronic records and signatures, require use-case-specific configuration and validation. No blanket compliance claim is made.

Why teams switch to Zeak

Customize the ERP, or switch on iQM.

Building quality into your ERP is a project, then a product you maintain. A separate QMS avoids the build but adds a second place to look.

Full comparison (PDF)
Time to first value01
Customize the ERPSix to nine months of build and validation
Zeak iQMWeeks: read-only alongside your process, on real records
Build cost02
Customize the ERPA build project: design, workflows, integrations, testing and validation
Zeak iQMNo workflow, form, integration or audit-trail code to write
Connected records03
Customize the ERPBuilt and maintained by your project
Zeak iQMOrders, batches, suppliers and SOP revisions referenced live
Validation04
Customize the ERPEvery custom change re-validated
Zeak iQMA validation accelerator: traceability, IQ/OQ/PQ templates, test evidence
ERP updates05
Customize the ERPYour custom code retested every service-update cycle
Zeak iQMiQM sits outside your ERP code; connectors are maintained by Zeak
Changing the process06
Customize the ERPA change request to IT
Zeak iQMConfigured by your administrator
Is iQM a fit?

A quick, honest check before you evaluate.

Signs iQM will help
  • Investigators rebuild batch, order and supplier details before they can start
  • Supplier-caused defects are found, but claims are rarely filed or recovered
  • CAPAs close, but the change that removes the cause never happens
  • The risk register is reviewed in meetings, not updated by what happens
  • Sites run different ERPs, or quality lives in spreadsheets
  • An inspection, audit or customer review is coming
Signs to wait, or start elsewhere
  • You need a LIMS, document control or training system firstiQM connects to those systems; it does not replace them. Start there, then connect iQM.
  • There is no one to own the processA pilot needs a named process owner and a few hours a week from the quality team.
  • Your current process works and nobody feels the costIf there is no visible cost or risk to fix, wait until there is one worth measuring.

Recognize three or more signs? A one-hour walkthrough of your current process is usually enough to tell whether a pilot is worth it.

Start with a pilot · low risk by design

Prove one process. Then expand.

One site, one process family, one owner, one measure Quality and Finance agree. You can stop after any step and keep everything you have learned.

  1. 01ScopeOne process family at one site, with a named process owner and success and failure criteria.
  2. 02DefineQuality and Finance agree the baseline and measures before work begins.
  3. 03BuildMasters, approvers and connectors configured in your test environment—read-only first, your ERP untouched.
  4. 04ValidateReal records run alongside your process, with a backtest on your history and results reviewed against the baseline.
  5. 05Launch & expandMove up the autonomy ladder, and to the next process or site, only when your criteria are met.
What it takes from your team
Process owner
A few hours a week through the pilot
Quality team
A few hours a week for real records and feedback
Finance contact
Baseline agreement at the start; review at the readout
IT and platform owner
Read-only access, single sign-on, roles and a test environment
What we will not ask you to do
  • Replace your ERP or the process your team built
  • Move your master data
  • Sign a long commitment before the pilot result
  • Accept a business case built on headcount reduction
  • Turn on AI, or move past Observe, before you are ready

Built by founders with 25+ years each delivering SAP, Oracle and Microsoft Dynamics programs in regulated industries, with prior work at Accenture and Oracle.

How to engage

Start with iQM. Shape it to how you work.

Yes—we personalize iQM to match your procedures, initiatives and organization. Choose the path that fits where you are.

Discuss your requirements
01BASE SOLUTION

Start with iQM

The production-ready solution, configured to your products, transactions, departments, approvers and signatures.

HOW IT’S PRICED
Terms agreed in your proposal
Selected opportunities may be co-invested with Zeak.
02PERSONALIZE

Enhance it to your processes

Match iQM to your procedures and initiatives: your fields, workflows, methods, reports and integrations.

Typically tailored
Forms and required fieldsApproval routing and signaturesChange classes and profilesRisk scoring methodsTask templates and checklistsIndustry starter packsDashboards and KPIsNew connectorsReports and exports
HOW IT’S PRICED
Time and materials
Custom enhancements to an existing application require your T&M approval before work begins.
03NEW SOLUTION

Build something new

For a need beyond iQM, we evaluate the solution with you and agree the delivery model that fits.

HOW IT’S PRICED
Time and materials · Fixed cost · Hybrid: T&M + outcome-based
We explore every option with you.
How an enhancement worksShare the need → we scope and estimate it → you approve → we build it on the Zeak platform and release it through the governed path described in DevOps.
Start with one process

Bring us your quality problem.

One process family, one site, one measure Quality and Finance agree. Selected opportunities can be co-invested with Zeak. Scope, timing and pilot terms are agreed in your proposal.

Take the details with youFree PDF downloads
zeak1 PAGE
iQM QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Quality decisions belong where the work happens.
zeak.io
One-page brochure
The problems iQM solves, the standards it supports and how to start.
Download PDF
zeakCUSTOMER OVERVIEW
7 MODULES · 197 FEATURES
iQM Quality Management
zeak.io
Customer overview
All 197 features, the value method, the pilot approach and hard questions answered.
Download PDF
Before you decide

Hard questions. Plain answers.

Including the questions a careful buyer should ask us, with the limitations stated up front.

See all Zeak FAQs
Fit with your systems

No. iQM works alongside it. Where your ERP has quality orders, inspection or sampling, iQM uses them, and adds change control, CAPA, deviations, complaints, risk, samples and tasks on the same records.

Compliance and control
Working with Zeak